@fantuan
so now you being "generalistic" ones? with argument like
Frequent use of equivocation and straw man arguments
i mean look. you can't even argue about the exact point i provided. like you bringing up
"I’m the one who set up a Tor forum myself—so are you saying I brainwashed myself?"
which had no point on your argument, the argument by itself is hollow... do you think setup tor forum have any weight against brainwash argument? do you really understand it or not?
about your argument
You lump together
welp i just want to make my point simpler since you seems not able to get the first point correct... so i really think you had difficulty on understanding complex things, so i made it easier. but the core argument still remain which you never ever touch it at all.
next ones was
Using age and academic performance to assert superiority
lol, its logical ones, You can't just expect dumb people to have the same quality of critical thinking as people with a higher academic background and more maturity. for sure you seems never work right? or not yet in "real case" since your family will provide for you, in contrast i come from poor family, on age of 15, booth my parent said, if i can help with anything, feels free to do so. because my dad had moved, and the salary wasn't good. That's why at 16, I started all the projects I had and started making real money, which was wild back then. I could pay bills, electricity, and even buy days' worth of food.
rejecting academic performance is dumb idea, imagine people with last rank on school on all subjects (which for sure dumb and hard time thinking) argue about "academic performance doesn't matters" which is wild... chinese for sure they thrive from western counterpart because they learn harder, watch how common chinese try their best to learn alot of books just to get approved by uni.
so this argument from you was dismantled. (i dont need to touch the age for sure. its simple argument more mature you're, more experience you had, want more context? i at the age of 21, had issuw with law and police from one of my project, thanks god, and all my friend and family, i can solve those issue, which found out its common issue with people who works at server-database things) still dont understand it? welp then its my point, age and academic performance does matter
next issue you talking
A biased understanding of transgender issues
then can you explain why you think transgender was okay?
and what the real core argument that you can justified about it? other than free will?
imagine if you bringing up free will, does it now accomodate people to had sex with their own daughter? their own mother? sister? brother? dog? explain it.
look you the one bringing that up, first time i seeing you on forum i never think about it, i dont really care whether you gay, or not, LGBT or not... but since you said drop some comment, and other people seems arguing, one with good argument, another with bad ones, i just want to argue with real base ones, and seems you cant even follow the same quality as other. right? (prove with your argument pls, so far i read it, its just like normal highschooler talking empty general things, that all people already know. Or in short, it's just like high school kids playing with words without any real core argument during a class presentation.)
next ones
Strong undertones of conspiracy theories
9/11 was carried out by "random Arabs"? Passports surviving the fire? Steel melting? — These are classic 9/11 conspiracy theories.
then explain.... which you think is wrong? already proven that almost all "sane" builder will build strong skyscraper, you think getting hit by plane will level the entire building to the ground? and when steel melt (not really melt, but they become soft) you think random arabic country ID card will remain? which ones was conspiracy when its factual ones? critical thinking where? plane hit > burn > steel become soft, and its only few floor, i never talk the conspiracy ones like its bombed from inside... for sure if its factual, after crash, entire few floor and plane was done. corpses? its jet fuel they said.... let alone the body, IDCARD is gone.... and yeet they find it? which ones was conspiracy? which ones telling the truth? me or you?
Gaddafi’s Libya offered free healthcare and education, yet the West labeled it a terrorist state — This is a gross oversimplification of complex geopolitics.
can you explain this too?
welp core idea that the west dislike about gaddafi was
- United States of Africa
- he want to make gold pegged//gold based currency
- nationalize oil sector
which part of them was hard and complex on your brain? tell me which ones?
or you just use ai to answer it without really answer it? bruh this is why i hate when discussing heavy topic with people. this is really what you get, you provide so much data and fact, yeet the people can't even understand it or just simply run away from topic
then making new excuses and issue without even touching the base argument.
imagine if you talking with people IRL. like 1:1 discussion with onlooker, the feels of shame when running away from topic was honest. and it keep you in track if you had ones
dismantled once again.
now how about you answer few above? imagine if topic was too hard, you just yapping and label it as "complex" welp its not that complex if you had experience and academic performance. almost all things in this world had clear cut reason, directly or indirectly
vietnam wars? simple USA just afraid more and more communist state appear if vietnam become ones, indirect? you can see they just want to win more compared to red-block ones. so more and more country will join the western-ones
middle east? its just more simple than anything. if your brain not yet there, welp simplified ones was "does car bombing is normal on middle east before western invade them? answer is no"
why no? this is where brain can be used...dig it 👍 For sure, digging into things and learning on your own is way more beneficial for the brain than having everything spoon-fed to you.
now i think i already dismantled all your newest "argument"
and you "answer none of mine"
maybe its good for you to start respecting other (by) start doing real reading and answering instead using Red Herring tactic or doing Ad Fontem to other people. its so wild to see young people too lazy to think at the point they saying "Using age and academic performance to assert superiority" xD imagine you using that argument on any uni on my country xD you will get thrown out of class... in fact the age and academic performance really matter xD thats why some jobs require minimum age and degree lol (yes i repeating it again)