1 replies - 20 views - 1 thanks - 0 tippers - 2 watchers
The DNM OPSEC bible always says to send XMR to wallet A and then send to wallet B, wallet B then sends to the DNM. I'm using this as an example of a high threat model scenario, but I think this applies to all matters where threat models demand a higher level of OPSEC.
My question is, does this matter so much if you acquired your XMR outside of a KYC exchange?
it's called "churning"
sending to an intermediary wallet
1 single intermediary wallet might not be enough if sending just after the 10 blocks confirmation
from my understanding, the more time passes between churning is best
since currently the ring size is 16, more time passes, more decoy things are happening or somethin somethin, it's a bit too techy for me but i think it's kinda how it works
after FCMP++ however, it wont be an anonymity set of just 16 but the whole blockchain as a whole so literally millions
so rather than doing wallet A -> wallet B (intermediary "churn" wallet) -> wallet C
would suggest more churns and more time in between each
